Is it polite to not give the option of bringing a guest on the invitation for those who are single? We are beginning to be concerned that there will be too many for the reception hall and thought it might free up some chairs if we did not give people the option of bringing a guest. Is that awful and impolite?
Thanks for your help!
(This post was
edited by TWQadmin on Jan 7, 2005, 1:18 PM)
If your guest has a fiance or live-in / long time significant other then you'll want to invite them both by name; not "and guest". One exception, bridal parties partners are to be invited. If you absolutely have to pare down the list wou can invite you do not have to invoite the single friends and family members with a guest, although making al of your guests comfortable is optimal.
Here are some ways to cut your list:
1. Keep the list to just friends and family; refrain from inviting coworkers unless they are your very close friends. You can invite just your boss if you absolutely have to without ruffling any feathers.
2. Omit the kiddies, if you can. You won't have to list "no children" on the invitations...just do not out the children's name on the inner envelope. List only those actually invited. This is more positive and upbeat then that negative "no children" or "adults only".
Make two lists, A List (all the "have to invites") and B list. Send out the invitations to the A list early and send to the B List as soon as all of your A Listers have responded, if there are any negative responses that is.
Good Luck! Top Wedding Questions Forum Moderator - "Write your sorrows in the sand, your blessings in stone".
If a guest doesn't know anyone involved with the wedding but you, then I would consider it polite to allow them to bring a guest. As a guest, I'd be very uncomfortable going to a wedding where I didn't know anyone and being all alone. Fellow Bride
invitation etiquette
