Is it tacky not to have a receiving line? My fiancée and I want to avoid this, and make things a little more personal by going around to each table and handing out our favors, and talking to the guests. I always here about how much people hate them, and I dont want to have to stand in a line for an hour. I figure none of my wedding party would care, and I would make a formal introduction/thank you to both parents during the speeches. What do you think??
It is considered proper to have a receiving line when hosting a wedding for more than 50 people. Often, with parties of more than 50 the hosts, although well intentioned, just never make it aroiund to everyone.
If you are having a small, intimate wedding than you could opt out of the receiving line, as long as you are sure to greet and welcome each guest. Top Wedding Questions Forum Moderator - "Write your sorrows in the sand, your blessings in stone".
When my son and daughter-in-law were married, everyone was asked to remain in their seats after the ceremony was over. My son and his bride then came back into the church and went from aisle to aisle thanking each and every person as they left the church. I thought this was a unique way of eliminating the reception line and also avoided the discomfort for parents and step-parents.
I love that idea. It is wonderful to thank everyone, personally.
However, the receiving line is also used to introduce the bridal party to the guests. So, this is a big reason to include it.
I don't think the wedding police would come to get you if you didn't though. It is such a minor thing. Just try to get around to everyone and introduce the wedding party in some way during the reception.
Receiving Line
